Mosul battle leaving legacy of environmental damage | AFP

[Published here on December 12, 2016]

Qayyarah, Iraq // The battle to retake Mosul from ISIL is leaving a legacy of environmental damage and health risks that will pose dangers to people for years to come.

Iraqis are already paying the price from the burning of oil wells and a sulphur factory by ISIL south of Mosul. Those fires, combined with water pollution and the potentially toxic remains of destroyed buildings, military equipment and munitions, will also present longer-term threats to people in areas around and inside Mosul.

“We are concerned about how the pollution will affect the health of local populations and negatively effect their capacity to rebuild quality, sustainable livelihoods within those affected areas,” said Jenny Sparks of the International Organisation for Migration.

A United Nations report on environmental and health risks in the Mosul area said that “hundreds of people were treated for exposure to chemicals, and millions are exposed to soot and gases from the burning oil wells. The events are occurring in an already environmentally degraded region, threatened by substantial environmental legacy risk from previous conflicts, coupled with serious desertification and land degradation primarily caused by unsustainable agricultural practices.”

ISIL set fire to oil wells in the Qayyarah area before it was recaptured in August by Iraqi forces advancing towards Mosul, the last Iraqi city held by the extremist group. Iraqi civil defence forces have been battling the fires but have managed to put out only some of them.

Soot from the burning wells has turned sheep that graze in the area black.

“We can’t sell our sheep any more. We have had some sheep die, other times people won’t buy them because they look black,” said Jaber, a 16-year-old shepherd.

ISIL also set fire to the Mishraq sulphur plant south of Mosul. The blaze was eventually put out, but not before it blanketed nearby areas with a haze of smoke that caused respiratory problems for those who inhaled it.

However, the aftermath of a 2003 fire at the same plant offers some cause for optimism, according to the UN report.

“Even though the vegetation and crops had been badly damaged by the fire, natural recovery was advancing well two years later,” it said.

Houses and other buildings damaged or destroyed by air strikes and shelling also pose a risk to civilians trying to return and rebuild their homes.

“Crushed building materials contain harmful substances, pulverised cement, household wastes and chemicals which can cause exposure hazards to civilians and people dealing with the rubble,” the UN report said.

The destruction of ammunition and weapons depots can “leave a toxic footprint”, while “destroyed military material such as tanks and armoured vehicles often contains various toxic materials”, it said.

Water pollution associated with the conflict is another potential problem, according to Eric Solheim, the head of the UN Environment Programme.

“The dumping of bodies, hazardous materials and oil into water sources have all been reported and are major causes of concern.” Inadequate disposal of waste also poses risks.

“Collapse of environmental governance can further lead to accumulation of solid household, medical and industrial waste, and if not dealt with properly, can result in increased burning of solid waste and resulting environmental health risks, or the outbreak of communicable diseases,” he said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s